Cases 211 - 220 of 84,334
Laurenti v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
George Laurenti
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ambruster v. Strom Aviation, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Paul Ambruster
Defendant:
Strom Aviation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Debenedetto v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Datasite, LLC v. Schechter Investment Advisors
as 0:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Datasite, LLC
Defendant:
Schechter Investment Advisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Board of Trustees of the Duluth Building Trades Health Fund et al v. Gartner Refrigeration Company et al
as 0:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Duluth Building Trades Health Fund, Board of Trustees of the Western Lake Superior Piping Industry Pension Plan, Board of Trustees of the Nothern Mechanical and Iron Range Plumbing & Pipefitting Joint Apprenticeship Committee 11 & 589 and others
Defendant:
Gartner Refrigeration Company
Cross Defendant:
Erdman Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
George et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Brenda George and Larry George
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lewis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lewis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Monaco v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Flavian Monaco
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lundsten v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Linda Lundsten
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
