Cases 21 - 30 of 5,674
Abdikarim v. Unichem
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Unichem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Idaho, State of et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Idaho, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Dexter v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Kamy Gwen Dexter
Defendant:
Joshua English, Renaldo Dupree, Ward County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdikarim v. Hinrich et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Kyle Hinrich, Joshua Gregory Lindstrom, Adam Dean Elder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdikarim v. Corwin Toyota of Fargo
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Corwin Toyota of Fargo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdikarim v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Barry Fitzgibbons, Tim Brennan, Conor R West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Minot, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Walter William Cartwright, III
Defendant:
Minot, City of, Ashley Olson, Kristian Shaide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Torgerson et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Detective Adam Torgerson and Shannon Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baker v. USA
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Michael Todd Baker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kisi v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Jean-Michael Kisi
Respondent:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
