Cases 21 - 30 of 217
Martinez v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
Esther Martinez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martinez et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Martinez and Richard Martinez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Martinez, Jr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Rudy Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Martinez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Franklin v. Lake County Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Bryan Michael Franklin
Defendant:
Lake County Ohio, Cpt Cynthia Brooks, K. Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martinez-Palacios v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Ernesto Martinez-Palacios
Respondent:
Warden Warden Garza and Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Luisa Martinez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Diaz v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
CLEOTILDE MARTINEZ DIAZ
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
