Cases 21 - 30 of 175
NELSON v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Defendant:
BEN RUSSELL, DAVID WAITE, KENNETH MURRAY PLOTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
AMAZON.COM, INC. et al v. WDC HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 1:2021mc00153
Receiver:
MARK A. ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON DATA SERVICES, INC.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
800 HOYTLLC
Defendant:
WDC HOLDINGS LLC doing business as NORTHSTAR COMMERCIAL PARTNERS, BRIAN WATSON, STERLING NCP FF, LLC and others
Interpleader:
WDC HOLDINGS, LLC, PLW CAPITAL I, LLC and BW HOLDINGS, LLC
CHURCH et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHURCH, LESLEY CHURCH, ALMA GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, LLOYD J. AUSTIN III, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
NELSON v. BURGEMEISTER et al
as 1:2021cv02264
Petitioner:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Respondent:
ASHLEY MORGAN BURGEMEISTER, LORI BETH TALBOT, KERI ANN YODER and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
POWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02038
Plaintiff:
SONIA POWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN S. TROTT, THOMAS O. RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF COLORADO v. NELSON
as 1:2021cv01931
Plaintiff:
STATE OF COLORADO
Defendant:
BRETT A. NELSON
MORRILL et al v. NELSON
as 1:2021cv01877
Plaintiff:
RODNEY MORRILL, NANCY CHURCH, KATHY NORGARD and others
Defendant:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
ELIAS v. NELSON
as 1:2021cv01879
Plaintiff:
ROSANA FONSECA ELIAS
Defendant:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF COLORADO v. NELSON
as 1:2021cv01882
Plaintiff:
STATE OF COLORADO
Defendant:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
