Cases 21 - 30 of 4,333
Intl Union of Painters & Allied Trades Dist Cncl, et al v. Warren Smith, et al
as 24-3282
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 6, An Appointing Fiduciary of the Southern Ohio Painters Health and Welfare Plan and Trust (the "Fund"), JIM SHERWOOD, Union Trustee of the Fund, LEE DENNEY, Union Trustee of the Fund and others
Intervenor:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE SOUTHERN OHIO PAINTERS HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN AND TRUST FUND
Defendant:
WARREN T. SMITH, Union Trustee and Assistant Administrator of the Fund, DANA CLARK, Union Trustee of Fund, JEREMY TURI, Employer Trustee of the Fund and others
Painters District Council No. 58 et al v. D. Johnson Painting LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Painters District Council No. 58, Carl Farrell, St. Louis Painters Pension Trust and others
Defendant:
D. Johnson Painting LLC and D'Von Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. Apache Industrial United, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02510
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Savings Fund and others
Defendant:
Apache Industrial United, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust et al v. J. E. Simas Floors, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust, Board of Trustees of the District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
J. E. Simas Floors, Inc. d/b/a JE SIMAS FLOORS, a Nevada corporation, James Edward Simas, Taylor Simas Samms and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund v. Union Signs and Printing
as 1:2024cv02436
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Union Signs and Printing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Local 806 Structural Steel and Bridge Painters of Greater New York Employee Trust Funds et al v. Iron Bridge Constructors, Inc.
as 7:2024cv02206
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Local 806 Structural Steel and Bridge Painters of Greater New York Employee Trust Funds, Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Trust Funds, Trustees of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades National Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Iron Bridge Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Board of Trustees of the Southern Nevada and California Glaziers, Fabricators, Painters and Floorcoverers Pension Trust Fund v. Spectrum Construction Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Southern Nevada and California Glaziers, Fabricators, Painters and Floorcoverers Pension Trust Fund
Defendant:
Spectrum Construction Group, Inc. and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Painter et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Ellen Painter and Robert Hightower
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Trustees of the District Council No. 14 Metal Polishers 401(k) Retirement Plan Fund; and Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund v. The Stone and Metal Group LLC
as 1:2024cv02180
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the District Council No. 14 Metal Polishers 401(k) Retirement Plan Fund; and Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund
Defendant:
The Stone and Metal Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
