Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Powell et al v Homecomings Financial et al
as 1:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
LaDon Powell and Margeret Dennis
Defendant:
Homecomings Financial LLC , GMAC Mortgage LLC and GMAC Mortgage Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Powell v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Tammy Powell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Johnson & Johnson Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smidt v. Ryle et al
as 2:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Richard J Smidt
Defendant:
Franklin J Ryle, Wyoming Department of Transportation John Cox, Wyoming Highway Patrol Colonel Sam Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wachsmuth v. Powell WY et al
as 1:2010cv00041
Plaintiff:
Tricia Wachsmuth
Defendant:
Tim Feathers, Chad Minor, Mike Cretien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sharman et al v. Powell Valley Health Care Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Kathy Sharman and Phil Sharman
Defendant:
Powell Valley Health Care Inc and Elizabeth Spomer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00206
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
