Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Boykin v. Skeens et al
as 1:2017cv01358
Plaintiff:
David Boykin
Defendant:
T Skeens, Vilt, Newhall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Melivin et al
as 1:2017cv01256
Plaintiff:
Jessie R Lee
Defendant:
Michael Melivin, . Michelin, Kelly Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee
Defendant:
Michael P Melvin, Emily Ruskin, Hadsall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrian Daniels v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 17-1344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRIAN DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center, EDWARD J. VILT and JOHN & JANE DOES, John and Jane Does/Employees at Pontiac Correctional Center
De La Garza v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01057
Plaintiff:
Cesar De La Garza
Defendant:
John . Baldwin, Gladyse Taylor, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Hoban v. Terri Anderson, et al
as 16-1246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH HOBAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRI ANDERSON, RANDY PFISTER, SHERRY BENTON and others
Lorenzo v. Godinez et al
as 1:2015cv01506
Plaintiff:
Wilson Lorenzo
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Randy Pfister, Guy Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pyle et al
as 1:2015cv01326
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Jacob Pyle, Christopher Leipold, John Zook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrei Pagsisihan v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-2579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREI G. PAGSISIHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Chief Administrative Officer, in his official and individual capacities, MARVIN REED, Assistant Warden of Programs by the IDOC, in his official and individual capacities, MARK ALLEN, Commissary Supervisor by the IDOC, in his official and individual capacities and others
Wilson v. Rundle et al
as 4:2015cv04078
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Wilson
Respondent:
James Rundle, Anthony Buckley and Lieutenant Vilt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
