Cases 21 - 30 of 195
Qiana Winn et al v. California Post Acute LLC
as 2:2021cv02854
Defendant:
California Post Acute LLC doing business as California Post Acute and DOES 1-50
Plaintiff:
Qiana Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv09009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ingram et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv06954
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingram, Denise Hernandez, Charles Crane and others
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc., Kaiser Permanente International, Grocery Outlet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv06762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
(PS) Conerly et al v. Winn et al
as 2:2020cv01833
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Tillman-Conerly, James Conerly and Carina Conerly
Defendant:
Kiana Turner, John Patrick Winn and Sharif Roldan Tarpin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Winn v. Saul
as 3:2020cv05706
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Anthony Winn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tolve-Winn v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04943
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Liam Francis Tolve-Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PS) Young v. Winn et al
as 2:2020cv01472
Defendant:
John Winn and Robin Leslie Pearl
Plaintiff:
Daniel Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best Supplement Guide, LLC et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020at00466
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Joanne Mounce, Sonia Y. Angell and others
Plaintiff:
Best Supplement Guide, LLC and Sean Covell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Best Supplement Guide, LLC et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv00965
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Joanne Mounce, Sonia Y. Angell and others
Plaintiff:
Best Supplement Guide, LLC and Sean Covell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
