Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Rule v. Frahm et al
as 2:2010cv01170
Defendant:
Carey D Frahm and Lou Somerville Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert R Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Carey v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2010cv00143
Petitioner:
Gordon M. Carey
Respondent:
Catherine Masto Cortez and E. K. McDaniel
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mellema v. Carey et al
as 3:2009cv00365
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mellema
Defendant:
Shaun Carey, Randy Waterman, Thomas Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gilreath et al v. Fox Limousine, Inc.,
as 2:2008cv01632
Plaintiff:
George Gilreath, Carey Tenio, Richard Tenio and others
Defendant:
Fox Limousine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tracy, Jr. v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2008cv00393
Plaintiff:
Linwood E. Tracy, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huntington v. Hart et al
as 2:2008cv00676
Plaintiff:
John Huntington, John Huntington, John Huntington and others
Defendant:
Carey Hart and Hart & Huntington, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ogilvie et al v. Cobb et al
as 3:2008cv00269
Plaintiff:
Brett W Ogilvie and Merry C Ogilvie
Defendant:
Carron Cobb, Klaich Animail Hospital, LTD, Lori Harris and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Carey Industrial Park, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00948
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Defendant:
Carey Industrial Park, LLC, Tiforp Investments, LLC and Hualapai Pavillion Centre, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
