Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Maxwell et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv07484
Defendant:
Police Officer Casillas, Police Officer Mohammed Choudhury Shield # #13389, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Casillas v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00714
Plaintiff:
Ginger Casillas
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 1:2012cv08333
Plaintiff:
John Joyce-Summerfeld, Parithan Kungsuvvan, Luz Martinez Acosta and others
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Massey et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2012cv07289
Plaintiff:
Robert Massey , Benny Malone , Laura Malone and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Casilla v. Philip & Jack Hirth Management
as 1:2012cv06008
Plaintiff:
Raul A. Casilla
Defendant:
philip & Jack Hirth Management , Hirth & Hirth , Hirth Real Estate Entities and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Casilla v. Phillip & Jack Hirth Management et al
as 1:2012cv02503
Plaintiff:
Raul A. Casilla
Defendant:
Phillip & Jack Hirth Management and Sheila Hirth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carey v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carey
Defendant:
The City of New York , New York City Police Department, Anthony Casilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casillas v. Murray
as 6:2003cv06119
Petitioner:
Aneudy Casillas
Respondent:
Timothy P. Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
