Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Chatman v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Annie Chatman
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Wyeth, LLC, Schwarz Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chatman v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2010cv00079
Petitioner:
Derrick Chatman
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chatman et al v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Chatman, Eunice Chatman, Latrice Chatman and others
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., ABC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chatman v. Adams County and Adams County Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
David Chatman
Defendant:
Adams County and Adams County Board of Supervisors, Darrel Grinnel, Unknown Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chatman et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC.
as 2:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman and Carol Chatman
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Chatman v. Montgomery
as 5:2008cv00291
Plaintiff:
Nevelyn Chatman
Defendant:
Edward Montgomery and Edward Montgomery
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Chatman v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2008cv00198
Plaintiff:
Lebarron E. Chatman
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chatman DO NOT FILE v. King et al
as 1:2007cv00018
Petitioner:
Frank C. Chatman DO NOT FILE, Jr.
Respondent:
Ronald King and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams, et al v. A.P. Green Ind., et al
as 1:2001cv00213
Plaintiff:
Harry Cecil Burris, Charles Edward Bourn, Donell Smith and others
Defendant:
United States Mineral Products Co., Beazer East, Inc., Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
