Cases 21 - 30 of 57
PAYNE v. PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 1:2017mc00959
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MEDSTAR SOUTHERN MARYLAND HOSPITAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PAYNE v. PROUD MARY'S OWNERS et al
as 1:2017mc00958
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
PROUD MARY'S OWNERS, KASS, MITEK & KASS, PLLC, HOWARD PAYNE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PAYNE v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND and PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. ANDREWS AFB
as 1:2017cv00571
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
ANDREWS AFB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2017cv00297
Defendant:
BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
Plaintiff:
SHELAGH PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
DIBENEDETTO et al v. IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY et al
as 1:2016cv02429
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Plaintiff:
DAVID DIBENEDETTO , DIANE MARTIN , LAURA PINATTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
PAYNE v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2016cv01478
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WATTS v. PHILLIP et al
as 1:2016cv00999
Plaintiff:
RALPH L. WATTS
Defendant:
ROBERT F. PHILLIP, GARY A. BACON, BAKER MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ST. HELENA HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
ST. HELENA HOSPITAL , WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER , HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
