Cases 21 - 30 of 53
STEVENS v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00262
Petitioner:
ALAN A STEVENS
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRYANT v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00260
Petitioner:
CHARLES BRYANT
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BURROWS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2007cv00247
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ALLAN BURROWS
Defendant:
DORIS WILLIAMS, BETH SCHARFF, G. FEARDAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SINGLETARY-EL v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00241
Petitioner:
ERIC SINGLETARY-EL
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCINTOSH v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, MICHAEL NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBRAHIM et al v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00228
Plaintiff:
JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, EDWARD REILLY, DEBORAH SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROSS v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00227
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH and B. R. JETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCINTOSH et al v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00222
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH and ANY OTHER SUCCESSORS TO THEIR OFFICES, ET AL.
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, M NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00223
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, B. R. JETT, ANTHONY BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00215
Petitioner:
NOAH R. ROBINSON
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
