Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Snap Sports v. Z Courts
as 2:2015cv00856
Plaintiff:
Snap Sports
Defendant:
Z Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alliance Health Networks et al v. A to Z Pharmacy et al
as 2:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Alliance Health Networks and Skyline Health Services
Defendant:
A to Z Pharmacy and Matt Sterner
Cross_claimant:
A to Z Pharmacy
Cross_defendant:
Matt Sterner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gollaher v. Morgan County et al
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Scott Logan Gollaher
Defendant:
Morgan County, William Z. Wentland and Jann L. Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin v. Summit County et al
as 2:2014cv00715
Plaintiff:
Tracy Erwin
Defendant:
Summit County, Summit County Sheriff's Office, Zachary Nakaishi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music et al v. Toad'z et al
as 2:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music , Universal - Songs of Polygram International , Paul Simon Music and others
Defendant:
Toad'z, Montyne A. Anderson, Kenneth B. Slavens and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Joe Hand Promotions v. Anderson et al
as 2:2013cv01020
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions
Defendant:
Montyne Anderson and Toad'z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Union Pacific Railroad v. Harsac et al
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad
Defendant:
Harsac and Alan Z. Sachter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Livingston et al v. York et al
as 2:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dale Livingston and Fred Brunsvik
Defendant:
Louise York, Ted Stewart, Lindsey LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxam North America v. Z&H et al
as 2:2010cv00473
Plaintiff:
Maxam North America
Defendant:
Z&H and Lon J. Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Wood Products, Inc. v. Design House Cabinetry et al
as 2:2009cv00512
Plaintiff:
National Wood Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Design House Cabinetry, Douglas Z. Garritson, Sheri J. Garritson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
