Cases 21 - 30 of 7,634
TMCT PLLC v. Wright et al
as 9:2024cv81046
Defendant:
WRIGHT PRIVATE OFFICE DESIGNATED ACTIVITY COMPANY, Paul Andrew Wright and ETERNA PRIVATE CLIENTS EUROPE DESIGNATED ACTIVITY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TMCT PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ross v. Warden, Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv02055
Petitioner:
Steven Andrew Ross
Respondent:
Warden, Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HORSMAN v JEFFERSON et al
as 4:2024cv00342
Defendant:
ANDREWS LAW FIRM PA, Brett Jefferson and Ryan Andrews
Plaintiff:
Patrick Horsman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Andrews v. State of Florida
as 3:2024cv00867
Defendant:
State of Florida
Plaintiff:
Dallas A. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAPP v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
ANDREW A SAPP
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUTLER v. BIDWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00182
Defendant:
KODY BIDWELL and GAGE COWART
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BUTLER, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suess v. Omnicore Health Benefits Agency LLC
as 0:2024cv61511
Defendant:
Omnicore Health Benefits Agency LLC
Plaintiff:
Andrew Duncan Suess
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Suess v. MFP Agency, LLC dba Total Health
as 6:2024cv01504
Plaintiff:
Andrew Duncan Suess
Defendant:
MFP Agency, LLC dba Total Health
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Andrews v. Larson et al
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Dallas A. Andrews
Defendant:
Captain Frost, Hammont, Sergeant Krelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
