Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Conrad Jess Zapien v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 2:1994cv01455
Respondent:
Arthur Calderon and Jeanne Woodford
Petitioner:
Conrad Jess Zapien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Calderon
as 5:1999cv20614
Petitioner:
Fred H. Freeman
Respondent:
Arthur Calderon
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Dwight Staten v. Arthur Calderon, et al
as 09-16540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT A. STATEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR CALDERON, N. GRANNIS, DAVID L. WINETT and others
Edward Thomas v. A. LaMarque, et al
as 09-15879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. A. LAMARQUE, ARTHUR CALDERON, K. MYLER and others
Charles Chatman v. Richard Early, et al
as 09-15683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD EARLY, Regional Administrator, JOHN CHEN, Chief Deputy Inspector General, M. MONTEIRO, Associate Warden and others
Darryle Williams v. Arthur Calderon, et al
as 09-15243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYLE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR CALDERON, JOHN W. MOOR, ALLEN YIN and others
Jesse Gonzalez v. Arthur Calderon
as 2:1995cv02345
Respondent:
Arthur Calderon
Amicu:
Death Penalty H/C Law Clerks
Petitioner:
Jesse Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Paul Archuleta v. Arthur Calderon
as 08-56023
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL ARCHULETA
Respondent - Appellee:
ARTHUR CALDERON, Warden
Chatman v. Early
as 3:2003cv02820
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman
Defendant:
Richard Early, John Chen , M. Monteiro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Calderon, et al
as 1:2003cv05389
Plaintiff:
Darryle Williams
Defendant:
Arthur Calderon, John W Moor, Allen Yin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
