Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Healy et al v. Adams Construction VT, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
Philip Healy and Lee-Ann Healy
Defendant:
Adams Construction VT, LLC, William W. Adams and Lesley Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00062
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Dale M. Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Steuerwald v. Washington County et al
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
John Steuerwald
Defendant:
Washington County, Anthony Facos, City of Montpelier, Vermont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubacz v. Waterbury, Vermont, the Village of et al
as 2:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Adam Hubacz
Defendant:
Waterbury, Vermont, the Village of and William Shepeluk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cijka v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv00173
Plaintiff:
Adam Cijka
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tracy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Adam Tracy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Department of Children and Families, Commissioner
as 2:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Bahji Amelia Adams
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. Adams et al
as 1:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregg F. Adams, Margaret D. Adams and EverBank
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
MRP Acquisition, LLC v. Adams
as 2:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
MRP Acquisition, LLC
Defendant:
Sean R. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
