Cases 21 - 30 of 409
Adams, et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10972
Plaintiff:
Deborah Adams, et al, Deborah Adams, Stephen Altenbuarg and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cross Defendant:
Stephen Carlson
Nevills v. David et al
as 1:2023cv10839
Plaintiff:
Damion Nevills
Defendant:
Unknown David, Unknown Al-Rahmi, A. Dalton and others
Al Qassimi Academy v. Abuhaltam
as 1:2023cv00289
Defendant:
AL QASSIMI ACADEMY, ISMAIL ABUHALTAM and Ismail A. Abuhaltam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Al-Rawaf v. US Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv10424
Plaintiff:
Mahmood Abdulridha Mohammed Al-Rawaf
Defendant:
US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Kenneth Madsen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Al Noor Alaili Trading Co., LLC v. U.S. Department of Commerce et al
as 2:2023cv10084
Plaintiff:
Al Noor Alaili Trading Co., LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Commerce, GINA M RAIMANDO, BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY and others
Malott v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2022cv13096
Plaintiff:
Michael Malott
Defendant:
George Stephenson, Kristopher Steece, Unknown Van and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
$10,469.00 U.S. Currency, et al.
as 2:2022mc51650
In Re:
$10,469.00 U.S. Currency, et al.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Mazen Kassab
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
