Cases 21 - 30 of 48
AMOS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv11514
Plaintiff:
JO ANN AMOS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. ZUCKERBERG et al
as 1:2018cv09289
Plaintiff:
AMOS BROWN
Defendant:
MARK ZUCKERBERG and MARK HUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMOS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv08171
Plaintiff:
LEE AMOS
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMOS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv12368
Plaintiff:
ELLSWORTH, III AMOS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRADICE et al v. CITY OF GARFIELD et al
as 2:2017cv11722
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE CARRADICE and R J
Defendant:
CITY OF GARFIELD , RAYMOND KOVACH , RONALD BOHANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HILL et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv03852
Plaintiff:
AMOS HILL and CHRISTINE HILL
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NASH et al v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2017cv03648
Plaintiff:
MONICA NASH , HECTOR NAZARIO , TE'AMO NASH and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOSEPH TUCCILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2016cv08883
Plaintiff:
AMOS BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMOS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2015cv00809
Plaintiff:
CAROL AMOS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
