Cases 21 - 30 of 69
JONES v. SMITH et al
as 4:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
SHERRIE REENEA JONES
Defendant:
ANTHONY SMITH, JACOB RIEBEN and CLIFFORD CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04867
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2021cv02615
Petitioner:
William Anthony Smith
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64381
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52745
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41644
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40996
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. U.S. Attorney
as 2:2021cv00558
Petitioner:
Corey Anthony Smith
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney and U. S. Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30770
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2021cv01397
Petitioner:
William Anthony Smith
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
