Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Malloy v. Davenport et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arthur Malloy v. Warden, et al
as 11-16116
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
Arthur Malloy v. David Wise, et al
as 11-11626
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID WISE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Arthur Malloy v. David Wise, et al
as 11-11540
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID WISE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Arthur Malloy v. St Clair CF Warden, et al
as 11-11291
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY
Respondent - Appellee:
ST CLAIR CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Arthur Malloy v. David Wise, et al
as 10-11371
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY, a.k.a. Arthur D. Malloy
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID WISE, Warden, TROY KING, The Attorney General of the State of Alabama and ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDON & PAROLES
Malloy v. Wise et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
David Wise, Troy King and The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malloy v. Wise et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00467
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
David Wise and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malloy v. Wise et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00934
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
David Wise and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Malloy v. Jones et al
as 2:1986cv01160
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
Charlie Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
