Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert, Oh, Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Rosch et al
as 7:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Winston NaJee Reed
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Harold Clarke, Warden Jeffery Kiezer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. Webber et al
as 7:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
Webber, Bates, Woodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Dowell et al
as 7:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
T. Dowell, Harold Clarke, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Adkins et al
as 7:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
L. Adkins, Robert H.B., David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Mathena et al
as 7:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
Dr. Mathena, S. Snow, Teresa Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Haynes et al
as 7:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
D. Haynes, David Anderson, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
