Cases 21 - 30 of 57
AVILA v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv09422
Petitioner:
ABDIEL F. AVILA
Respondent:
STEVE JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AVILA-HASSIG v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv04630
Plaintiff:
LYDIA T. AVILA-HASSIG
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABECKA-AVILA v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2017cv13762
Plaintiff:
NANCY BABECKA-AVILA
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2017cv05591
Plaintiff:
YANIRA AVILA SANTOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
ARAIZA-AVILA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv04003
Petitioner:
JESUS A. ARAIZA-AVILA
Respondent:
THE WARDEN OF NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02795
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MULLEN et al v. SEASHORE HOME BUILDERS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv03678
Plaintiff:
REGINA MULLEN and IGNATIUS MULLEN
Defendant:
SEASHORE HOME BUILDERS, INC. , PEDRO JIMENEZ-AVILA , XYZ CORPORATION(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
