Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Miller v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Gil A. Miller
Defendant:
Marcos Acevedo, Aimee Barton, Mark Bench and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Barton v. Robinson et al
as 2:2011cv00941
Plaintiff:
John Barton
Defendant:
Leland Robinson, Dean Evans, Dan Chatterton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Blamires et al
as 2:2011cv00557
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Craig A. Blamires, Ani-Yiswka Real Estate Holding Trust, W. Richard Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Barton v. Whitehouse et al
as 1:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
Nicole Ashley Barton
Defendant:
Jeremy Whitehouse, Intermountain Mill & Design, Equity First Investments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barton v. Utah, State of et al
as 2:2010cv00507
Plaintiff:
John Barton
Defendant:
Utah, State of, Utah Department of Human Services, Utah Division of Child and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Utahns for Ethical Government v. Barton et al
as 2:2010cv00333
Plaintiff:
Utahns for Ethical Government
Defendant:
Paul B. Barton, Robert P. Pero, Diane Freston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton et al v. Vallejos et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Richard Gareth Barton, Richard Gareth Barton, Richard Barton Enterprises and others
Defendant:
Ted D. Vallejos, Tracy C. Vallejos, Mary M. Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bagnes v. State of Utah
as 2:2008cv00807
Plaintiff:
Barton Bagnes
Defendant:
State of Utah and FNU Mudrock
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bagnes v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2008cv00802
Plaintiff:
Barton Bagnes
Defendant:
State of Utah, Salt Lake County Justice Court and FNU Gibbons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fisher v. Barton et al
as 2:2008cv00104
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Fisher
Defendant:
Richard Barton, Department of Corrections, Timothy Langely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
