Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 58
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1211
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi
Defendant - Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv10386
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Taylor EL TTEE v. 43rd District Court
as 2:2015cv10360
Plaintiff: Betty June Taylor EL TTEE
Defendant: 43rd District Court
Daniel McDermott v. Betty Taylor
as 15-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee: DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellant: BETTY JUNE TAYLOR
Taylor v. Black Hawk Recovery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv10143
Plaintiff: Betty June Taylor
Defendant: Black Hawk Recovery, Credit Acceptance Corporation and United States Bankruptcy Court
McDermott v. Taylor El We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv14855
Plaintiff: Daniel McDermott
Defendant: Betty June Taylor El
McDermott v. Taylor El
as 2:2014cv14737
Plaintiff: Daniel McDermott
Defendant: Betty June Taylor El
Betty Taylor v. Michigan, State Of
as 14-2229
Plaintiff - Appellant: BETTY JUNE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN, STATE OF
Betty Taylor v. Daniel McDermott
as 14-2221
Debtor: In re: DANIELLE BROWN
Appellant: BETTY JUNE TAYLOR
Appellee: DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, U.S. Trustee
Taylor v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2014cv13379
Plaintiff: Betty June Taylor
Defendant: Michigan, State of, Department of Treasury and Michigan Department of State

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?