Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Berryhill v. Henry, et al
as 10-7056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, T. BASS-LESURE, Oklahoma County Judge, VIRGIL C. BLACK, Oklahoma County Judge and others
Berryhill v. Miles-LaGrange et al
as 5:2010cv00802
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Vicki Miles-LaGrange, Lee R West, Robin J Cauthron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Payne et al
as 6:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
James H. Payne, Frank H. Seay, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Evans, et al
as 10-7051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD EVANS, Warden, BOBBY BOONE, TERRY CRENSHAW and others
In re: Berryhill
as 10-7053
Petitioner:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Respondent:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General, Attorney General and others
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Barrett v. Jones et al
as 6:2010cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Evans et al
as 6:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Edward Evans, Bobby Boone, Terry Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hornsby v. Jones, et al
as 10-6064
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAROLD D. HORNSBY
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, BOBBY BOONE, Assistant Director DOC and J D DANIELS, Assistant Director Parold Board
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
