Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Nickerson v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin and James Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin and James Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Dale, Dave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Reinert, Jr. v. Brian Gootkin, et al
as 22-35921
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD DOUGLAS REINERT, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN GOOTKIN and PETE BLUDWORTH, Warden
Jacob Smith v. Johnson, et al
as 22-35766
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON, Designated Hearings Officer, ROXANNE WIGERT, JAMES SALMONSEN and others
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Dale, Dave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Russell Wayne Bullock
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Brian Gootkin and Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Albert v. Montana Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-35637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN ALBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOC-MT CLINICAL SERVICES DIVISION, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Jacob Smith v. Montana Board of Pardons and Parole, et al
as 22-35636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MISSOULA PRE-RELEASE CENTER and others
Jacob Smith v. Johnson, et al
as 22-35633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON, Designated Hearings Officer, ROXANNE WIGERT, JAMES SALMONSEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
