Cases 21 - 30 of 228
Abbott v. Otis-Sanders et al
as 2:2022cv01271
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
Loretia Otis-Sanders, Shelley Power, Shelia Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, USA, William P Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. U S P Pollock et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Petitioner:
Marcus D Wright
Defendant:
Warden U S P Pollock, Merrick Garland and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Abbott v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2021cv03890
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Sekou Ma'at, Oscar Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2021cv03865
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyd v. Grady County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv03798
Plaintiff:
Michael Osiris Boyd
Defendant:
Grady County Jail, U S M, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 2:2021cv03774
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Shelly Power, Loretta Otis-Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Ma'at et al
as 2:2021cv02238
Defendant:
Designation & Sentence Computation Center, S Ma'at, F C I and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jeansonne v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv02097
Plaintiff:
Shane Jeansonne
Defendant:
USA and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
