Cases 21 - 30 of 424
Samuels et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv04687
Plaintiff:
Jeff Samuels
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Power Default Services, Inc. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Joanna Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Burks v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Burks, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Burks, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Burke and Vincent Burke
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Burks v. PlainsCapital Bank
as 3:2023cv02472
Plaintiff:
Patti Burks
Defendant:
PlainsCapital Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Adams et al v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams, Christopher Scot Taylor, David Allen Jones and others
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04056
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03653
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burke v. State of Texas
as 4:2023cv03654
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burke v. Fagan
as 4:2023cv03617
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Sheriff Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
