Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Moses v. Cain et al
as 2:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Larry Moses
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Robertson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv00171
Defendant:
R. Augustine, Burl N. Cain, Jason Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dudley v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00156
Respondent:
Burl N. Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Clarence Dudley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cornwell v. Cain et al
as 2:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
Grover Cornwell
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00715
Respondent:
Burl N. Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Cordell Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raiford v. Cain et al
as 2:2012cv01866
Plaintiff:
Darrin Raiford
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brashears v. Cain
as 2:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
John Brashears
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faulkin v. Cain et al
as 2:2011cv02592
Plaintiff:
James Faulkin
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cager v. Cain
as 2:2011cv02386
Plaintiff:
Quantrell Cager
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
