Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Burns et al v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv02593
Plaintiff:
Robert Burns and Lisa Burns
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Wildermuth v. Consultants in Pulmonary Medicine et al
as 2:2014cv02203
Plaintiff:
Pamela Wildermuth
Defendant:
Consultants in Pulmonary Medicine, Dominique M. Crain, Vance R. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Harte et al v. Denning et al
as 2:2013cv02586
Plaintiff:
Adlynn K. Harte and Robert W. Harte
Defendant:
Johnson County, Kansas Board of Commissioners , Frank Denning , Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Davis et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv02409
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Davis and Rhonda Burns
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., DISYS Corporation and Adecco Employment Services
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fairmount Fire Protection District v. Up In Smoke Custom Burning, Inc.
as 2:2013mc00204
Plaintiff:
Fairmount Fire Protection District
Defendant:
Up In Smoke Custom Burning, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States Securities v. Burns
as 6:2012mc00101
Respondent:
Eric T. Burns
Petitioner:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Burns et al v. Rockhurst University Continuing Education Center, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02487
Plaintiff:
Julie Burns , Cheryl Flood and Carolyn Tarcha
Defendant:
Rockhurst University Continuing Education Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
