Cases 21 - 30 of 145
Burns v. Francis et al
as 3:2021cv05064
Plaintiff:
Tanya Burns
Defendant:
Kail Francis, Murphy Family Ventures, LLC, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Feher et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00767
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Byrd, Hope Colling, Angela Bomba and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PTI Union, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries, PTI Royston, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNAPP et al v. Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05035
Plaintiff:
SPENCER KNAPP and ELIZABETH YGARTUA
Defendant:
Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc., FAG Bearings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lance v. Ronald E Ray dba TRT Enterprise et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Defendant:
Ronald E. Ray doing business as TRT Enterprise and Morgan W Burns
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. Peterson et al
as 2:2021cv04030
Plaintiff:
Damion Burns
Defendant:
Peterson and Adkinsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Saul
as 6:2020cv03305
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Whittle v. Camden County Sheriff's Dept. and Corrections Division et al
as 2:2020cv04060
Defendant:
Garton, Oldrich, Sue Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Timmy Ray Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkhart v. Vinson et al
as 2:2020cv04086
Defendant:
McGuire, Martin, Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Scott Burkhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkhart v. Vinson et al
as 2:2020cv04070
Defendant:
McGuire, Martin, Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Scott Burkhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Saul
as 3:2020cv05021
Plaintiff:
Max Burns
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
