Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Anthony Pitre v. James LeBlanc
as 10-30778
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY C. PITRE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, Warden, C. Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Bridget v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center et al
as 6:2010cv01226
Plaintiff:
Allen Bridget
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armant v. Stalder, et al
as 09-30027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE ARMANT
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD STALDER, STEVE RADER, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JAMES LEBLANC, Warden and others
Pitre v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 6:2008cv01831
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Pitre
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burnes v. Rogers
as 08-30900
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNIE BURNES
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Hedge v. Warden C Paul Phelps
as 08-30888
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL GILBERT EDWARD HEDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN C PAUL PHELPS CORRECTIONAL CENTER, also known as Robert Henderson
Lowe v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 2:2008cv00674
Plaintiff:
Bryan Lowe
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sedlock v. Warden, C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 2:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Steven Sedlock
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. City of Dequincy, et al
as 07-30997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
BUDDY HENAGAN, In His Individual Capacity, MIKE SUCHANEK, Individually and In His Official Capacity, GARY COOPER, Mayor, In His Official Capacity and others
Hedge v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 6:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
Darryl Gilbert Edward Hedge
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
