Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Autry v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00609
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terry Autry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seidel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00610
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christina Marie Seidel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv04037
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Monica Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duchamp v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv01205
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pauline Duchamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GREGER et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00675
Plaintiff:
Misty Greger and Joey Greger
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Michael Escamilla v. C.R. Bard Incorporated, et al
as 5:2019cv01103
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capers v. C.R. Bard Inc., et al
as 4:2019cv00660
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Capers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Annabelle Espinoza v. C. R. Bard Incorporated, et al
as 5:2019cv01104
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Annabelle Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMurdy et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Coloplast A/S, Mpathy Medical Devices, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nina Lee McMurdy and Frederick McMurdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sifuentes-Bravo v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00023
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jesus Sifuentes-Bravo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
