Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Larsen v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02847
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Larsen
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Rowland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02729
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv05413
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Schmidt v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv01851
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Schmidt
Respondent: Daniel Paramo and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Christopher Michael Ortiz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05000
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant: Christopher Michael Ortiz
Christopher Michael Rowland v. McDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv04671
Respondent: Warden McDonald
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Rowland
Rowland v. McDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01460
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Rowland
Respondent: McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Michael Manelski v. Superior Court of San Bernardino et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00926
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Manelski
Respondent: Superior Court of San Bernardino and Stanford E Reichert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Michael Boultinghouse et al v Guillerma Hall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2007cv00142
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Boultinghouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?