Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 2:2015cv00669
Plaintiff:
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Defendant:
Gone Country Motor Sports, Inc., Timothy Lloyd , Scott Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
McMahon v. Country Motors II, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01024
Plaintiff:
Alyssa McMahon
Defendant:
Country Motors II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Country Motor Cars of Greenwich, Inc. v. Chambers
as 7:2013cv01217
Plaintiff:
New Country Motor Cars of Greenwich, Inc.
Defendant:
Jamie Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
New Country Motor Cars of Greenwich, Inc. v. Chambers
as 1:2013cv01217
Plaintiff:
New Country Motor Cars of Greenwich, Inc.
Defendant:
Jamie Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
A&D Auto Sales, Inc. v. US
as 13-5019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A&D AUTO SALES, INC., ALLEY'S OF KINGSPORT, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER JEEP WEST, INC. and others
Respondent:
COLONIAL DODGE, INC. and HOOVER CHRYSLER JEEP INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Amicus Curiae:
SPITZER MOTOR CITY, INC., SPITZER AUTOWORLD AKRON, LLC, SPITZER AUTOWORLD SHEFFIELD, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
