Cases 21 - 30 of 32
FCS PHARMACY, LLC et al v. AETNA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03944
Plaintiff:
FCS PHARMACY, LLC and WILLIAM GRIFFIS
Defendant:
AETNA, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SCHENCK et al v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
as 5:2010cv03363
Plaintiff:
NANCY SCHENCK and THOMAS SCHENCK
Defendant:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPAY v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04672
Defendant:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION , CAREMARK RX, LLC , CAREMARK, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. SPAY
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
VUCETICH v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01755
Plaintiff:
KAREN VUCETICH
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC. and CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COFFMAN et al v. CVS CAREMARK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv03831
Plaintiff:
ALBERT G. COFFMAN and FLORENCE COFFMAN
Defendant:
CVS CAREMARK, INC., ROBERT DWIGHT BERGEY, SONNI LEE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCINTYRE et al v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv02776
Plaintiff:
ETHEL MCINTYRE and MILTON MCINTYRE
Defendant:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALECK v. CVS CAREMARK COMPANIES
as 2:2008cv00767
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM E. ALECK
Defendant:
CVS CAREMARK COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
NEW VIEW GIFTS AND ACCESSORIES, LTD. v. PLANET HOME, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01893
Plaintiff:
NEW VIEW GIFTS AND ACCESSORIES, LTD.
Defendant:
PLANET HOME, INC., LINK GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLP and CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
