Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Finn Pette et al v. International Union of Operating Engineers
as 2:2012cv09324
Plaintiff:
Anne Brophy, James McLaughlin, John Crooks and others
Defendant:
Cornel Sneekes, Patrick L Sink, Kuba J Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Bhupinder Rai et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv08717
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Aaron Cervantes, Oscar Martinez and Bhupinder Rai
Sturdy Floss, Inc., a Virginia corporation v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02238
Plaintiff:
Sturdy Floss, Inc., a Virginia corporation
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS/Pharmacy, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aaron Cervantes v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv07089
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Aaron Cervantes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirby v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv01517
Plaintiff:
Georgiana Kirby
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meryl Overton v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 8:2012cv00982
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Meryl Overton
Aguilar et al v. Interhealth Neutraceuticals Incorporated et al
as 3:2012cv01284
Petitioner:
Mark Aguilar , Lorraine Nelson , Jeffrey Dieguez and others
Respondent:
Interhealth Neutraceuticals Incorporated, Iovate Health Sciences, Inc., Iovate Health Sciences Research, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
