Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Bradley et al
as 1:2012mc00027
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
John W.R. Bradley and Channing W. Steele
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Midwest Business Capital v. Steele
as 1:2011cv00988
Plaintiff:
Midwest Business Capital
Defendant:
Channing W. Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00271
Defendant:
Dr. Bob Behnke, Ms. K. Carter, Ms. J. Cobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. The Millennium Lotus, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00229
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
The Millennium Lotus, LLC , V. Thanh Nguyen , Chan Dang-Vu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Dr. L. Wang et al
as 7:2010cv00476
Defendant:
Dr. Bob Behnke, Dr. L. Dobransky, Dr. L. Wang and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Dr. L. Wang et al
as 1:2010cv01178
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Defendant:
Dr. L. Wang, Ms. C. Mayes, Dr. L. Dobransky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Citibank, N.A. v. An Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A.
Defendant:
An Construction Co., Inc., Chan W. An and Suzan P. An
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
An v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
as 1:2009cv01366
Plaintiff:
Chan Woong An
Defendant:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
Abraham et al v. Total Realty Management, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
Steven Abraham, Joseph Alexander, Debra Alexander and others
Defendant:
Total Realty Management, LLC, Mark Dain, Mark Jalajel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
