Cases 21 - 30 of 94
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. CHAPMAN et al
as 1:2017cv01182
Defendant:
BURT E. CHAPMAN, UNKNOWN HEIRS AND LEGATEES OF THRESSA M. PITTS, WILLIAM BUTCHER and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CHAPMAN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2017cv00254
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHAPMAN
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CHAPMAN v. OBAMA
as 1:2016cv01763
Plaintiff:
LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CHAPMAN, III
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDMUNDS v. BUSH et al
as 1:2016cv00979
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ANN EDMUNDS
Defendant:
GEORGE W BUSH, SR, KEITH ZOLLINGER, MARTHA THORPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. v. KARN CHARUHAS CHAPMAN & TWOHEY PC
as 1:2015cv01818
Plaintiff:
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
KARN CHARUHAS CHAPMAN & TWOHEY PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHOGO et al v. REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN et al
as 1:2015cv00951
Special Master:
WAYNE D. BRAZIL, ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, JAY GANDHI and others
Plaintiff:
CALEB NDEDA CHOGO, STEPHEN MACHARIA, SAMUEL M NJUGUNA and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
RUDOLPH v. WHIPPLE et al
as 1:2013cv00660
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE RUDOLPH
Defendant:
JOHN WHIPPLE, RALPH CUNNINGHAM, LARRY HIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
CHAPMAN v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY
as 1:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
NATHAN A. CHAPMAN, JR.
Defendant:
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011mc00187
Plaintiff:
FRANK H. CHAPMAN, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
WILSON v. CHAPMAN
as 1:2011cv00337
Petitioner:
LESLIE MARSELLUS WILSON
Respondent:
A. CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
