Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Dearmond v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Dearmond
Defendant:
United States of America, Karen Edenfield, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dedrick v. Batts
as 1:2014cv00112
Petitioner:
Jerry Lewis Dedrick
Respondent:
Myron L. Batts, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dedrick v. Batts et al
as 7:2014cv00067
Respondent:
Warden Myron L. Batts, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Petitioner:
Jerry Lewis Dedrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Womble et al
as 1:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferguson v. Womble et al
as 1:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Rashaad Ferguson
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lacey v. Samuels et al
as 4:2013cv00993
Plaintiff:
William P Lacey
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Rodney W Chandler and Teresa Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer et al v. Womble et al
as 1:2013cv00689
Plaintiff:
Addones Spencer and John P Sanchez
Defendant:
John Womble, Sreedhar Polavarapu, University Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nunn v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv00601
Plaintiff:
Tyron Nunn
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, M. Martin, N Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00886
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Villasenor v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv00640
Defendant:
Dr. S Alarcon, Dr. Regina Benjamin, Eric Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Villasenor
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
