Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Baron et al., v. St. Anselm Exploration Company et al.,
as 1:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Melvyn D Baron and Christy A Baron
Defendant:
St. Anselm Exploration Company , Anna M.R. Wells and Mark S. Palmer
Counter_claimant:
Anna M.R. Wells, St. Anselm Exploration Company and Mark S. Palmer
Counter_defendant:
Melvyn D Baron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gordon v. Department of Agriculture
as 1:2008cv00195
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff:
Christi Gordon
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Tapia et al v. Alessio et al
as 1:2007cv01312
Plaintiff:
Rachel Ann Tapia and Christy Marie Morgan
Defendant:
Gillian Folmar Alessio, Gillian Folmar Alessio, City of Santa Fe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tapia et al v. Alessio et al
as 6:2007cv01312
Plaintiff:
Rachel Ann Tapia and Christy Marie Morgan
Defendant:
Gillian Folmar Alessio, Gillian Folmar Alessio, City of Santa Fe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matteucci Galleries vs. Blakley Trust, et al
as 6:2007cv00407
Plaintiff:
Matteucci Galleries
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Lucille Christie Blakey, David Porras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interpleader
Matteucci Galleries vs. Blakley Trust, et al
as 2:2007cv00407
Plaintiff:
Matteucci Galleries
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, David Porras and Lucille Christie Blakley Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interpleader
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
