Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Belmar v. Con Edison Consolidated et al
as 1:2014cv08089
Plaintiff: Rene Belmar
Defendant: Con Edison Consolidated, Leon Mener, Stanley Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whylie v. Con Edison et al
as 1:2014cv05457
Defendant: Bendiner and Schlesinger Inc., Con Edison and Dependable X-Rays
Plaintiff: Carol Whylie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Belessis-Casoria v. Con Edison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02517
Plaintiff: Marina Belessis-Casoria
Defendant: Con Edison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Belessis-Casoria v. Con Edison
as 1:2013cv02870
Plaintiff: Marina Belessis-Casoria
Defendant: Con Edison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dunbar v. Sundance Management Group Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07975
Plaintiff: L. Dunbar
Defendant: Sundance Management Group Inc., Con Edison and Dept. of Environmental Protection
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Cigarette Labeling & Advertising Act
Stankovic et al v. Con Edison Official et al
as 1:2012cv02466
Defendant: Con Edison Official, Widmark Lefort and Quiana Williams
Plaintiff: Snezana Stankovic and Valeria Stankovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barney v. Con Edison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1999cv00823
Plaintiff: Dorothy Barney
Defendant: Con Edison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01866
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pinkney v. NYCHA et al
as 1:2010cv01763
Plaintiff: Kathy Pinkney
Defendant: NYCHA, Accent Energy, Con-Edison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menendez v. Con Edison
as 1:2009cv04552
Plaintiff: John Menendez
Defendant: Con Edison and Con Edison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?