Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Velasquez-Contreras v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Armando Velasquez-Contreras
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Sergio Contreras Perez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mendez v. Contreras
as 2:2014cv00799
Plaintiff:
Dulce Esperanza Mendez Gonzalez
Defendant:
Emilio Contreras Batres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bustillos et al v. Hidalgo County Board of Commissioners
as 2:2013cv00971
Plaintiff:
Madonna Bustillos , Francisco Contreras , Concepcion T Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Hidalgo County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Contreras v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
David Arnoldo Contreras
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Matamendes et al v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2013cv00725
Plaintiff:
Juan Matamendes and Graciela Contreras
Defendant:
Justin Montgomery , Aaron Jones , Brian Pitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Salazar v. Dona Ana County Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Conrad V. Salazar
Defendant:
Dona Ana County Detention Center, Chris Barela, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00940
Plaintiff:
Cathy Contreras
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Lovelace Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00746
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
