Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Green v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 0:2020cv60583
Defendant:
Deputy Brown, Correct Care Solutions and Sheriff Gregory Tony
Plaintiff:
James Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knowles v. Correct Care Solutions
as 4:2019cv10216
Plaintiff:
Darrian Antonio Knowles
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Well Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paull v. Tony et al
as 0:2019cv62993
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions (CCS) Inc., Eric Prospere, Adrienne Philpart and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Paull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campagnolis v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 4:2019cv10206
Defendant:
Amy Curry, Correct Care Solutions, Jasmyne Swain and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin Campagnolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FETZER v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
as 4:2019cv00492
Defendant:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, WELL PATH SOLUTIONS CORRECT CARE LLC, FLORIDA CIVIL COMMITMENT CENTER ET AL and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FETZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houtsma v. Correct Care et al
as 2:2019cv00588
Defendant:
Jody Colmin, Donald Sawyer, FCCC and others
Plaintiff:
John Houtsma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houtsma v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2019cv00381
Defendant:
Christopher Catron, Melinda Masters, Donald Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
John Houtsma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis V. Gregory et al
as 0:2019cv61431
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lewis
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houtsma v. Shew et al (DeSoto County)
as 2:2019cv00277
Respondent:
CCS, FCCC, LLC Correct Care and others
Petitioner:
John Houtsma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOUTSMA v. SHEW et al
as 4:2019cv00133
Respondent:
CCS, FCCC, LLC CORRECT CARE and others
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
JOHN HOUTSMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
