Cases 21 - 30 of 116
In Re: Crain Brothers Inc as Owner Pro-Hac Vice of the Hopper Barge T506
as 2:2021cv00950
Plaintiff:
Crain Brothers Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30501
In Re: Crain Brothers Inc as Owner Pro-Hac Vice of the Hopper Barge ING 1954
as 2:2021cv00951
Plaintiff:
Crain Brothers Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30501
In Re: Crain Brothers Inc as Owner Pro-Hac Vice of the Hopper Barge ING 1953
as 2:2021cv00952
Plaintiff:
Crain Brothers Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30501
Conard et al v. Clark Crain Autoplex St. Francisville LA, LLC
as 3:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
Danyelle Hodges, Joshua Conard and Joshua M. Conard
Defendant:
Clark Crain Autoplex St. Francisville LA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Crain v. Mancuso et al
as 2:2021cv00872
Defendant:
Tony Mancuso, Warden Burkhalter and Warden Miller
Plaintiff:
Derlon K Crain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Lisa Jenkins, Robert Tanner, Cynthia Crain and others
Plaintiff:
Logan Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B P X Properties (N A) L P et al v. Ernest H Turner, III et al
as 5:2021cv00273
Defendant:
George Crain, Jr, City of Shreveport, Mattie Lou Loe Brown and others
Plaintiff:
B H P Billiton Petroleum Properties (N A) L P, B H P Billiton Petroleum (TxLa Operating) Co, B P X Properties (N A) L P and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Jackson v. Boone et al
as 2:2020cv03393
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Jackson
Defendant:
Gavin Lemaire, Antwan Sauders, Ervin Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2020cv00746
Defendant:
Lisa Jenkins, Robert Tanner, Cynthia Crain and others
Plaintiff:
Logan N. Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holden v. Perkins, et al
as 2:2020cv02143
Defendant:
James Smoot, John L Crain, Justin Bice and others
Plaintiff:
Chloee Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
