Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Thomas et al v. Gateway Foundation Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00248
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Case Manager Ramero, Gateway Foundation Inc Employee Kidd, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Shimel, Robert S Thornley, Keipher A Loos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard et al v. Westcare Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00240
Defendant:
Wyoming Board of Parole Chair Person, Wyoming Attorney General Michael, Wyoming Attorney General Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Elmer Petersen, Deon A Leonard, Earl Dimas and others
Petitioner:
Michael L Hackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roeber v. Gateway Foundation Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Grievance Manager, Wyoming Attorney General Michael, Wyoming Department of Corrections Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Justin McKenney and Thomas Joseph Roeber
Petitioner:
John Alegria, Ronnie Morgan, Ernie Watts, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magallanes v. Harding et al
as 2:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
Eddie Magallanes
Defendant:
P Harding, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Correctional Officer, Eddie Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. WY Department of Corrections, et al
as 14-8033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT OWEN MARSHALL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC./CORIZON HEALTH, ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, individually and inis official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. Shannon, et al
as 11-8003
Petitioner - Appellant:
RITA ANN HUMPHREY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAN SHANNON, Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center and BRUCE A. SALZBURG, Wyoming Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
