Cases 21 - 30 of 70
CAMPBELL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CAMPBELL, JR. and KISHA CAMPBELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DWAYNE FOSTER, REGINALD BALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIBENEDETTO et al v. IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY et al
as 1:2016cv02429
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Plaintiff:
DAVID DIBENEDETTO , DIANE MARTIN , LAURA PINATTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
BENNETT et al v. GOOGLE, INC.
as 1:2016cv02283
Plaintiff:
DAWN BENNETT and DJ BENNETT HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
GOOGLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DAWN J. BENNETT HOLDING, LLC v. FEDEX TECHCONNECT, INC.
as 1:2016cv01388
Defendant:
FEDEX TECHCONNECT, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAWN J. BENNETT HOLDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.T. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2016cv01086
Plaintiff:
A. T. , DAWN CARPENTER and EDMUND TREPACZ
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
VASATURO v. PETERKA et al
as 1:2015cv01736
Plaintiff:
DARREN R. VASATURO
Defendant:
SASHA PETERKA, JAMIE ROUGHAN, GLENN PAQUETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HECHT v. SCHMIDT et al
as 1:2015cv00889
Plaintiff:
MARION A. HECHT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE P. SCHMIDT and DAWN KIL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
EALY v. CHILDS et al
as 1:2015cv00166
Petitioner:
LARRY E. EALY, SR.
Respondent:
SEMOINE CHILDS, KOBI COOPER, NICOLAI DAVENPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FITE et al v. BANKS et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ERIC FITE and ROBERT DARRYL REEVES
Defendant:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE BANKS, CARL BOONE, RALPH J. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
