Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Juul Labs, Inc. v. Shenzhen Azure Tech. USA LLC f/k/a DS Vaping P.R.C.
as 2:2020at00690
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Azure Tech. USA LLC f/k/a DS Vaping P.R.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv07135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03464
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00931
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. DC and DS Maddox, L.P. et al
as 8:2018cv02180
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Anna Marie Wiggins and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
DC & DS MADDOX, L.P., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and DC and DS Maddox, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ki Ho Yang et al v. Plasti Dip International, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09999
Defendant:
The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California, The Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company, Plasti Dip International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ki Ho Yang, Ko Eun Oh and Keith Yang
Cross Defendant:
Valspar Specialty Paints, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sahibzada Akhtar v. Air France-KLM et al
as 2:2017cv02045
Plaintiff:
Sahibzada Akhtar
Defendant:
Air France-KLM, Airbus DS GEO Inc., Air France-KLM Group Ads and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00280
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv09580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
