Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Sims v. Stanton et al
as 2:2019cv00833
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, David Stanton, Steven G Wolfton and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie L Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelien et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv02110
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Bureau of Land Management, Daniel Schiess and others
Plaintiff:
Rick Lovelien and Steven Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew v. Freeland et al
as 3:2018cv00500
Defendant:
Dafna Sharir, Byron G Wong, Stanley B Stern and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Matthew
Nominal Defendant:
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Not Used
as 3:2018cv00499
Defendant:
Dafna Sharir, Gary Matthew, Yuichi Nishigori and others
Nominal Defendant:
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klein v. Freeland et al
as 3:2018cv00439
Defendant:
Byron Wong, Dafna Sharir, Stanley B Stern and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Nominal Defendant:
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gracepoint Mining Corp v. MX Gold Corp et al
as 2:2018cv01732
Defendant:
MX Gold Corp and Dan Omeniuk
Plaintiff:
Gracepoint Mining Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dick v. Lister et al
as 3:2018cv00409
Plaintiff:
Kwassuh Wesley Glenn Dick
Defendant:
Michael R. Lister, Robert Eriquiaga and Dan Shyne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hof et al v. Nye County et al
as 2:2018cv01492
Defendant:
Andrew Borasky, Dan Schinhofen, Nye County Licensing Board and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hof and Cherry Patch LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maki v. Smuck et al
as 3:2018cv00365
Defendant:
Steven Kosach, Dan Greco and Janet Cobb Smuck
Plaintiff:
Charles Maki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Watts et al
as 3:2018cv00287
Defendant:
Mike Byrne, Dewayne Deal, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
